THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING
|
Bush is no Roosevelt on ecology By Derrick Z. Jackson, 4/24/2002 Bush is fooling few people as he abdicates the responsibility passed
down to him by Theodore Roosevelt. Under pressure by the courts and environmental
groups, the White House has coughed up thousands of pages of documents
showing that during the time it formulated its energy policy, it met almost
exclusively with executives and lobbyists for petroleum, coal, gas, nuclear,
and electric companies and related industries such as freight railroads.
Environmental groups were almost completely shut out.
The results are clear. While Bush recently lost his first attempt to
let petroleum companies drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, he
is moving ahead with a massive expansion of oil, gas, and coal exploration
on other public lands. He is considering rule changes that would relax
standards on the power plant emissions that contribute to the very acid
rain that threatens the lakes of the Adirondacks. He has let Superfund
cleanups slow to a crawl and wants to shift the costs of future cleanups
from the polluting industries to taxpayers.
One of the first major acts of Bush's presidency was to back out of
the Kyoto agreement on global warming and renege on his campaign promise
to set limits on carbon dioxide emissions, which contribute to warming.
Bush says he is promoting clean skies, but he may let coal companies cloud
the rivers with the waste they slash off mountaintops.
This is hardly in the spirit of Teddy Roosevelt. In 1908, Roosevelt
said, ''In utilizing and conserving the natural resources of the nation,
the one characteristic more essential than any other is foresight. Unfortunately,
foresight is not usually characteristic of a young and vigorous people,
and it is obviously not a marked characteristic of us in the United States.''
Foresight remains uncharacteristic of a United States that holds 4 percent
of the world's population but sucks up 25 percent of the world's energy.
Roosevelt once said that ''wild flowers should be enjoyed unplucked'' instead
of being used as ''ornaments for automobiles filled with jovial but ignorant
picknickers from cities.'' One wonders what Roosevelt would think of SUVs
and a Congress that refuses to increase gas mileage standards even though
the technology exists. The automobile itself has become the leading ornament
of Americans' ignorance about the environment.
It was not as if Roosevelt did not support industry. Roosevelt said,
''Conservation means development as much as it does protection.'' But by
so clearly letting industry write the nation's energy policy, Bush does
not hear the other side of Roosevelt, who said, ''I recognize the right
and duty of this generation to develop and use the natural resources of
our land, but I do not recognize the right to waste them or to rob, by
wasteful use, the generations that come after us. I ask nothing of the
nation except that it behave as each farmer here behaves with reference
to his own children. That farmer is a poor creature who skins the land
and leaves it worthless to his children.... Conservation is a great moral
issue, for it involves the patriotic duty of insuring the safety and continuance
of the nation.''
Contrast that with Bush, who asked for no energy sacrifice from Americans
either after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 or during the flare-up in
the Middle East that we depend upon for oil. Bush can build as many trails
in the Adirondacks as he wants. It means nothing if relaxed rules on emissions
kill the fish in that region's lakes. Earth Day will have meaning in the
Bush White House only when he asks as Roosevelt did 94 years ago:
''The time has come to inquire seriously what will happen when our forests
are gone, when the coal, the iron, the oil, and the gas are exhausted,
and then the soils have been still further impoverished and washed into
the streams, polluting the rivers, denuding the fields, and obstructing
navigation. These questions do not relate only to the next century or to
the next generation. It is time for us now as a nation to exercise the
same reasonable foresight in dealing with our great natural resources that
would be shown by any prudent man ... for himself and his children.''
Derrick Z. Jackson's e-mail address is jackson@globe.com.
This story ran on page A21 of the Boston Globe on 4/24/2002.
|