Uncovering the beauty, brutality of seduction

By Loren King, Globe Correspondent, 11/25/2001

NEW YORK - Catherine Breillat is no stranger to controversy. The 53-year-old French director, screenwriter, and novelist seems to relish her role of provocateur - each of her eight films offers a disturbing, complex, and often unflattering look at female sexuality, with violence, including rape, often juxtaposed with seduction and desire. This tangle of the sexy and the brutal has become Breillat's trademark, making her a director who specializes in sexual unease.

Many American audiences became acquainted with Breillat's work via the audacious ''Romance'' (1998) in which Breillat blurred the boundaries between art and voyeurism - triggering the age-old question, Is it art or is it pornography? ''Romance'' divided audiences into those that hailed the film as an erotic masterpiece, those that dismissed it as sexual titillation posing as postfeminist tract, and others who saw it as the complete negation of desire.

Her latest film, ''Fat Girl,'' which opens Friday, is less sexually explicit than ''Romance'' but it has nonetheless raised the ire of the Ontario Film Review Board, which objected to the film's candid depiction of adolescent sexuality. In ''Fat Girl'' two sisters, Anais, a chubby 12-year-old, and Elena, a pretty 15-year-old, are on holiday with their parents. Elena meets Fernando, an older Italian student, and is eager to lose her virginity to him. The centerpiece seduction scene is a symphony of tension and release, and the push-pull of desire and shame.

The film board refused to issue a rating to ''Fat Girl,'' which, says Noah Cowan, co-president of Cowboy Pictures, the film's distributor, is tantamount to banning the film. Unlike the US system, films cannot be screened in Ontario theaters without a rating. ''The film's images are not there to titillate,'' Cowan says. ''We want the film to be rated; we don't want people thinking it's a nice romantic comedy.''

The board objected to the sex scenes in ''Fat Girl'' because they depict teenage characters. Chairman Robert Warren told Indiewire, a wire service, that the board's ratings standard specifically forbids scenes that depict characters under 18 who are nude, partially nude, or in a sexually suggestive context.

The board offered two options to Cowboy Pictures and its Canadian partner, Lions Gate Films: appeal the board's ruling or cut the offending scenes. Not surprisingly, Breillat refused to change her film, and the distributors appealed. On Tuesday, the board voted 3-2 against ''Fat Girl.''

In a letter to the Ontario board, Breillat noted that one of her early films, ''36 Fillette'' (1987), also portrays the first sexual experience of a 14-year-old on holiday, a situation similar to the one in ''Fat Girl.'' Yet ''36 Fillette'' is readily available on video in Toronto.

''Unlike my previous film `Romance,' I made a choice not to show one single explicit sexual scene in `Fat Girl,''' wrote Breillat. ''The film is forbidden only to those under age 12 in France, whereas 'Romance' is forbidden to those under the age of 16.''

Interviewed in New York, where ''Fat Girl'' premiered at the New York Film Festival in September, Breillat says the 26-minute seduction scene was a meticulously prepared shot. ''The actresses are in the frame the entire time, so blocking had to be very precise. The camera had to be in the same position where the eye wanted to be. When [the scene] works, I got the expected emotion and also results that were unexpected.''

Thematically, this sequence is a precursor to the shattering conclusion of ''Fat Girl.''

''The seduction scene is a mental rape,'' says Breillat. ''[Elena] allows herself to be in this position, to be with a man who is lying. She is an accomplice because she knows he's lying, and so she loses her dignity. ... It's normal for teenagers to want this sort of sexual relationship during vacation. It's not meaningful, but teenagers are forced to dramatize it.''

Breillat says audiences can take the ending of her film however they like, as literal or as fantasy.

'''Fat Girl' is like a fairy tale, and spectators can interpret it for themselves,'' she says. ''I like to make spectators work with their own ideas of what is violent and brutal and what is intolerable.''

During question-and-answer sessions with festival audiences in Toronto and New York, Breillat says most remarks concerned the violence in ''Fat Girl.'' But after the Sept. 11 attacks, New York audiences seemed less jolted by the brutality in the film, Breillat says, and less inclined to ask questions about the film's ending.

Breillat's film career, which includes co-writing scripts with Liliana Cavani for ''La Peau'' and with Federico Fellini for ''E la nave va,'' has largely concerned itself with themes of sexuality, power, and relationships between women and men. She's considered as sexually provocative in her native France as she is in North America. Breillat laughs that she was ''born into controversy'' but describes herself as ''a normal person'' with a ''normal interest in sex.'' It is society that displays an abnormal interest in sex, she says, making it ''impossible to be normal.''

Breillat, whose older sister is actress Marie Helene Breillat, asserts that ''Fat Girl'' isn't autobiographical. ''Fat Girl'' was always the intended title, she says, but in France the film was released as ''A ma soeur'' (To My Sister). Though contemporary, the film has the look and feel of the 1960s: It transcends time as it juxtaposes sibling rivalry with sexual awakening as effortlessly as the sisters switch, in an instant, from flinging insults at one another to expressing tenderness and solidarity.

Breillat bristles at the controversy surrounding ''Fat Girl'' as well as over the sexual content of her other films. ''Everybody has sex; it is important not just for pleasure but for a sense of life, for everybody,'' she says. ''Human sexuality is a beautiful expression, not something dirty or disgusting.''

Breillat will continue to explore this fertile if dangerous terrain. This month she began shooting another film, which she describes as her own ''81/2.'' It will be, she says, a personal examination about ''what it is to make films, and all our fears, and all our inhibitions about sex.''

This story ran on page L9 of the Boston Globe on 11/25/2001.
© Copyright 2001 Globe Newspaper Company.