Check one: Male, female, helpless By Laura Gladney-Lemon A husband, a wife and two kids: a fairly common occurrence in divorce court, no doubt. But last week a Florida appeals court overturned a divorce and child custody decision because it ruled the divorce in question never legally happened. This decision came about because the husband, Michael Kantaras, was born with female genitals. Kantaras had a sex change operation in 1987, which, according to court documents, included "hormonal treatments, a total hysterectomy and a double mastectomy." In 1989 he married his wife, Linda, who was fully aware of his sex reassignment. Children immediately entered the Kantaras family, since Linda came to the relationship pregnant with a child. Michael subsequently adopted that child. Then, in 1992, the couple had a second child that resulted from artificial insemination. By all accounts, Kantaras is male to those who know him - mentally, physically and otherwise. Court documents outlined the following points that establish Kantaras' status as a man: * "As a child, while born female, Michael's parents and siblings observed his male characteristics and agreed he should have been born a 'boy.'" * "Michael always has perceived himself as a male and assumed the male role doing house chores growing up, played male sports, refused to wear female clothing at home or in school." * "Prior to marriage he successfully completed the full process of transsexual reassignment" * "His wife accepted, along with his friends, family and wor[k] colleagues, that Michael in his appearance, characteristics and behavior was perceived as a man. At the time of the marriage he could not assume the role of a woman." * "He has been accepted as a man in a variety of social and legal ways, such as having a male driving license; male passport; male name change; male modification of his birth certificate by legal ruling; male participation in legal adoption proceedings in court; and as a male in an artificial insemination program ... ." The divorce court that originally heard this case agreed that Kantaras was male. According to the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Judge Gerard O'Brien ruled that he was "legally a man" and granted him custody of his children. But despite overwhelming evidence of Kantaras' gender, Florida's 2nd District Court of Appeals overturned the divorce court's ruling last week. The appeals court nullified the original divorce and custody order because the marriage never legally existed. Basing its decision on cases in Texas, Kansas and Australia, the court ruled the "meaning of male and female, as those terms are used statutorily, to refer to immutable traits determined at birth." More simply, the court said the genitals with which a person is born forever determine that person's sex in the eyes of the law. Thus, technically, Michael and Linda were in a homosexual relationship, which is not recognized in the state of Florida. Furthermore, this ruling seriously jeopardizes Kantaras' chances at custody of his children because a Florida law bars homosexuals from being adoptive parents. Ironically, Kantaras' attorney pointed out that "Michael can't marry a woman in Florida but he can marry a man." This gives the theoretical green light for transgender people who are also gay or lesbian to marry their partners. It is highly unlikely that this is the outcome the court intended, but when common sense is ignored, illogical results will follow. The time has come for Americans to come to terms with the reality of transgender people. Considering the binary world we live in, let's look at the situation in which we have placed Michael Kantaras: He isn't a man, but certainly cannot be considered a woman. This being the case, one must ask if he will be relegated to the status of "other" and afforded no rights. Gladney-Lemon is a women and gender studies graduate student, a member of Alliance for a Feminist Option, a volunteer at the Women's Resource Center, a graduate representative to Student Government and a member of the Graduate Student Assembly.