Justice Dept. Probes Lawyers' Conduct By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer March 8, 2006 The Justice Department is investigating its lawyers' conduct in sending terrorism suspects to jail when there was insufficient evidence to charge them with a crime. At issue is the material witness law that Congress passed in 1984 to allow for the arrest and detention of witnesses who might flee before testifying in criminal cases. The investigation began after a report by two civil liberties groups said the Bush administration had used the law to detain at least 70 people since the Sept. 11 attacks. The disclosure came from the inspector general, Glenn A. Fine, in a semiannual report required by the Patriot Act. The department's Office of Professional Responsibility, which reviews allegations of misconduct, is looking into the cases of 13 individuals and one group of eight people who were detained together, Fine said. They were not further identified. The group appears to be the eight Egyptian men from Evansville, Ind., who were held for about a week in 2001 on material witness warrants when one of their wives falsely accused them of planning a suicide attack. The government has apologized to them and to at least five other people detained under that law. At least 30 of the 70 detainees were never called to testify before a court or grand jury, the American Civil Liberties Union and Human Rights Watch reported in June. Only 28 people were charged with a crime and most of those charges were unrelated to terrorism, the groups said. Seven were charged with providing material support to terrorist organizations. Lee Gelernt, senior staff counsel at the ACLU, said the material witness issue deserves more attention. "It's one of the least understood aspects of the Justice Department's domestic program after 9/11 in large part because so much of it happened in secret," Gelernt said. The department had no immediate comment Wednesday. Fine's report also catalogs potential violations by the FBI of laws and regulations relating to national security investigations. The bureau reported 108 instances in the past two years of tapping the wrong telephone number, intercepting the wrong e-mail, continuing to listen in on communications even though the warrant had expired and other problems. In one case, the FBI received the content of 181 telephone calls instead of just billing and toll records, Fine said. Apparent violations continued for 120 days in one case in which the FBI was at fault and for more than a year in another in which a third party, such as a telephone company, was to blame, Fine said. The FBI sent the reports to an oversight board of presidential appointees, which is supposed to report apparent violations of law or presidential orders to the attorney general. The Justice Department recently told the Electronic Privacy Information Center, an advocacy group that has sought information on the violations, that it has not received any reports about misconduct from the board, according a letter provided by the center. The Office of Professional Responsibility already is investigating the conduct of government lawyers who examined the administration's domestic eavesdropping program, office director Marshall Jarratt has said.